Analysing The Performance Impact of Internet Security Suites
One common complaint you would hear from users about internet security suites is that they negatively impact system performance. And this is true. In the past I have had bad experiences with security suites like F-Secure. Unfortunately the performance impact is one aspect which is often ignored during reviews. Earlier this year PC Mag picked up some of the popular Internet Security suites and analysed their performance. The results were telling to say the least. Some suites managed to more than double the boot time. Let’s have a look at their result of performance impact evaluations.
Boot Time: The average boot time of the PC prior to installing any security suite was about 60s. Norton Internet Security 2009 and Kaspersky Internet Security 2009 were the best of the lot and added only 15s to the boot time. F-Secure Internet Security 2009 and McAfee Total Protection 2009 nearly doubled the boot time where was BitDefender Total Security 2009 and Webroot Internet Security Essentials (WISE) more than doubled it.
File Copy: The real-time scanner can impact basic tasks like file operations. In order to check this out a series of move and copy were performed. Kaspersky Internet Security Suite 2009 was the best and added only 2% to the time required for performing the file operations. Trend Micro Internet Security Pro added 6%. Norton and Panda Global Protection 2009 ended up in between these two. The worse performer by far was Zone Alarm Internet Security Suite 2009 which added about 50% time.
Software Installation and Uninstallation: Panda was the lightest and added 6% time to the average installation and uninstallation time. Once again the heaviest were Zone Alarm and WISE (63% and 71% respectively).
Browsing Speed: Norton was the best and added only 13% time to the test. WISE added 25% time in spite of not having any sophisticated Web Antivirus. Kaspersky and Panda slowed browsing by 64% and 92%. McAfee Total Protection was the slowest of them all and more than doubled the time required for the surfing test.
You can view the synopsis of the PC Magazine comparison here and read the full report here. Norton Internet Security 2009, Norton 360 v3 and ESET Smart Security v4 (NOD32) were unsurprisingly the lightest internet security suites. Zone Alarm Extreme Security, Kaspersky Internet Security 2009, Panda Global Protection 2009 and Avira Premium Internet Security Suite 9 also performed fairly well and had acceptable impact on the system. CA Internet Security Suite Plus 2009, Webroot Internet Security Essentials, Trustport PC Security 2009, McAfee Total Protection 2009, F-Secure Internet Security 2009, Comodo Internet Security, Zone Alarm Internet Security 2009 and BitDefender Internet Security 2009 were the biggest culprits. All of them had significant impacts on system performance. Performance Impact is just one aspect you have to consider while choosing an Internet Security Suite. You must consider other factors like Detection Rate, Firewall Efficiency and Cleaning Efficiency. Which Internet Security Suite (or antivirus) do you use? Are you happy with its performance?
[Image courtsey: Kaspersky]
That’s why I would much rather have no suite… with such pathetic speeds already, all I require is to worsen it!
.-= Animesh´s last blog ..Gorkhaland: The Solutions & Why Not =-.
Yeah. An Antivirus alone should be sufficient in most cases.
However, antivirus software also has some overhead. Unfortunately in a hotel environment some sort of protection is necessary.
Interesting to see boot times, I’ve used Webroot products before and my computer slowed a lot. Not sure why they give Avira such a kicking? Zonealarm did well too???
.-= Jonny´s last blog ..Firefox Add Ons Collection by Jonnysblog =-.
Zone Alarm Extreme Security did well but Zone Alarm Internet Security 2009 was among the worse performers.
I have used Avira a lot in the past and always found it to be light. However, its web antivirus can act up and at times really slow down downloads. Also I have noticed that it slows down file copying from pen drives more than kaspersky. May be that affected its ratings.
But, you are right Avira is among the lighest for all practical purposes.
Kaspersky 2010 on Windows 7 boots up to exploit under 60seconds for me.
And those who want more security will have to give up some resources in return. No need to give the Security suite a shit.
.-= Ashish´s last blog ..Integrate Skydrive in your windows explorer =-.
This slim and light tablet comes with specifications that provides high computing
power. There are many new applications available for you to download within
the market. They only need to spend more affordable value for the technologies meanwhile they can get the exact same satisfaction as when they use
i – Pad.
Add garlic, ginger, red bell pepper, and pepper flakes to the pan and cook together a couple of minutes, then
add peanut butter and melt it. They can thrive in just about any environment and are less
reliant on moisture than other roaches. The odor can
smell like moldy must or worse than that.