<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Good Bye Windows 3</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pallab.net/2008/11/05/good-bye-windows-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pallab.net/2008/11/05/good-bye-windows-3/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:03:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Jage</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2008/11/05/good-bye-windows-3/comment-page-1/#comment-76911</link> <dc:creator>Jage</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:35:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/?p=385#comment-76911</guid> <description>remind me about 15th years ago :)
.-= JageÂ´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://bensukses.com/ponsel-hp/harga-tiphone-t88-bundle-telkomsel-push-email/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TiPhone T88 With Push Email Feature&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>remind me about 15th years ago <img
src='http://www.pallab.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br
/> .-= JageÂ´s last blog ..<a
href="http://bensukses.com/ponsel-hp/harga-tiphone-t88-bundle-telkomsel-push-email/" rel="nofollow">TiPhone T88 With Push Email Feature</a> =-.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2008/11/05/good-bye-windows-3/comment-page-1/#comment-76653</link> <dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:23:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/?p=385#comment-76653</guid> <description>At work, we&#039;ve just removed the last Windows 3.1 machine. A slight upgrade from a 3.1 till and 98 backend to a 98 till and xp backend.
It always makes me nostalgic - as a fairly young man my first proper computer (ie, the first one my dad let me use) was a 3.1 box and, all things considered, I don&#039;t actually do much more on my 3.6gHz tri-core with it&#039;s 4gig of ram than I did on that little box with it&#039;s megahertz of processing power and kilobytes (maybe megabytes) of memory. Okay, so web pages are more dynamic, but essentially microsoft word and the internet are the same technology - and the games are more realistic, but I could waste just as many hours back then as I can now.
The most important thing to me, however - the loss of Paintbrush. Paint just doesn&#039;t have the same feel - it isn&#039;t right. I actually hate the windows 7 paint, and preferred Paintbrush to winME/98/XP/vista paint.
On another note, however - does this technically mean that we&#039;re free to download 3.1? Or does it take more than that to count as abandonware?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At work, we&#8217;ve just removed the last Windows 3.1 machine. A slight upgrade from a 3.1 till and 98 backend to a 98 till and xp backend.</p><p>It always makes me nostalgic &#8211; as a fairly young man my first proper computer (ie, the first one my dad let me use) was a 3.1 box and, all things considered, I don&#8217;t actually do much more on my 3.6gHz tri-core with it&#8217;s 4gig of ram than I did on that little box with it&#8217;s megahertz of processing power and kilobytes (maybe megabytes) of memory. Okay, so web pages are more dynamic, but essentially microsoft word and the internet are the same technology &#8211; and the games are more realistic, but I could waste just as many hours back then as I can now.</p><p>The most important thing to me, however &#8211; the loss of Paintbrush. Paint just doesn&#8217;t have the same feel &#8211; it isn&#8217;t right. I actually hate the windows 7 paint, and preferred Paintbrush to winME/98/XP/vista paint.</p><p>On another note, however &#8211; does this technically mean that we&#8217;re free to download 3.1? Or does it take more than that to count as abandonware?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2008/11/05/good-bye-windows-3/comment-page-1/#comment-76646</link> <dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:58:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/?p=385#comment-76646</guid> <description>Loved 3.1. Still using it on my old computer.  Intro of W95 was a sad, sad day.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved 3.1. Still using it on my old computer.  Intro of W95 was a sad, sad day.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CaptainZM</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2008/11/05/good-bye-windows-3/comment-page-1/#comment-76640</link> <dc:creator>CaptainZM</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:53:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/?p=385#comment-76640</guid> <description>I wonder who designs the mini-OS&#039;s used on all the random crap today? Airline Movies, Cheap Cellphones, probably some newer Cars.
Microsoft and Apple focus on the big OS&#039;s for Netbooks, PC&#039;s, laptops, etc.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder who designs the mini-OS&#8217;s used on all the random crap today? Airline Movies, Cheap Cellphones, probably some newer Cars.</p><p>Microsoft and Apple focus on the big OS&#8217;s for Netbooks, PC&#8217;s, laptops, etc.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pallab</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2008/11/05/good-bye-windows-3/comment-page-1/#comment-76620</link> <dc:creator>Pallab</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:49:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/?p=385#comment-76620</guid> <description>Yeah. You are right. Fixing the gaffe.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. You are right. Fixing the gaffe.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nathan</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2008/11/05/good-bye-windows-3/comment-page-1/#comment-76619</link> <dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:53:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/?p=385#comment-76619</guid> <description>Cool article. However, your statement &quot;Was 100% compatible with older MS-DOS applications.&quot; doesn&#039;t really make much sense, considering Windows 3.x was a program, not an OS. Modern OSes need compatibilty because they are the environment the program runs in.
Windows 3.x is not the environment the programs run in, they run in MS-DOS and Windows 3.x displays them. Therefore, there is not really a compatibility factor.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool article. However, your statement &#8220;Was 100% compatible with older MS-DOS applications.&#8221; doesn&#8217;t really make much sense, considering Windows 3.x was a program, not an OS. Modern OSes need compatibilty because they are the environment the program runs in.</p><p>Windows 3.x is not the environment the programs run in, they run in MS-DOS and Windows 3.x displays them. Therefore, there is not really a compatibility factor.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nic stevens</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2008/11/05/good-bye-windows-3/comment-page-1/#comment-76618</link> <dc:creator>nic stevens</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:19:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/?p=385#comment-76618</guid> <description>Windows/286 and windows/386 both used protected mode and were prior to windows 3.x</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows/286 and windows/386 both used protected mode and were prior to windows 3.x</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
