<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: New Antivirus Shootout from Av-Test.org</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:03:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: antivirushero</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/comment-page-1/#comment-137497</link> <dc:creator>antivirushero</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 03:07:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-137497</guid> <description>heya cool blog, I found your web-site as I was doing some research on how to develop my website log. I was at the moment enquiring which spam pluggin you have for comments because MY SPOUSE AND I get lots on our site.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heya cool blog, I found your web-site as I was doing some research on how to develop my website log. I was at the moment enquiring which spam pluggin you have for comments because MY SPOUSE AND I get lots on our site.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: war379k</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/comment-page-1/#comment-80632</link> <dc:creator>war379k</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 06:45:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-80632</guid> <description>i personally think that if you want speedy pc then nod32 is ONLY choice. and if you want to focus on protection then Avira and Kaspersky is always best. But it takes a lot more memory than nod32.
Your have to choose. Speedy pc with less protection or Slow pc with more protection.
for more discussion....
http://instechgroup.blogspot.com/2010/01/feeling-stuck-with-antivirus.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i personally think that if you want speedy pc then nod32 is ONLY choice. and if you want to focus on protection then Avira and Kaspersky is always best. But it takes a lot more memory than nod32.</p><p>Your have to choose. Speedy pc with less protection or Slow pc with more protection.</p><p>for more discussion&#8230;.<br
/> <a
href="http://instechgroup.blogspot.com/2010/01/feeling-stuck-with-antivirus.html" rel="nofollow">http://instechgroup.blogspot.com/2010/01/feeling-stuck-with-antivirus.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LOL</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/comment-page-1/#comment-54397</link> <dc:creator>LOL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 03:46:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-54397</guid> <description>LOL...I stay away from anything with AOL in it. I have a great hatred for AOL that dates back to troubleshooting their service over 10 years ago. And besides this comparison is not even valid anymore. AOL sheild is no longer distributed.
We&#039;re Sorry!
AOL® Active Virus Shield is no longer available.
Looking for protection from viruses, spyware and hackers?
We are now offering McAfee® Virus Scan Plus-Special edition from AOL.
EWWW MCAFEEEE..JUST AS BAD AS AOL!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL&#8230;I stay away from anything with AOL in it. I have a great hatred for AOL that dates back to troubleshooting their service over 10 years ago. And besides this comparison is not even valid anymore. AOL sheild is no longer distributed.</p><p>We&#8217;re Sorry!<br
/> AOL® Active Virus Shield is no longer available.<br
/> Looking for protection from viruses, spyware and hackers?<br
/> We are now offering McAfee® Virus Scan Plus-Special edition from AOL.</p><p>EWWW MCAFEEEE..JUST AS BAD AS AOL!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: anynomus</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/comment-page-1/#comment-43422</link> <dc:creator>anynomus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:07:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-43422</guid> <description>Yes , Avira Antivir is real good .
Those people who complain abt the GUI/interface
probably bcoz they cant find any faults with it
or accept the fact that it has got better.
Good recommendation</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes , Avira Antivir is real good .<br
/> Those people who complain abt the GUI/interface<br
/> probably bcoz they cant find any faults with it<br
/> or accept the fact that it has got better.</p><p>Good recommendation</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Shankar Ganesh</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/comment-page-1/#comment-25700</link> <dc:creator>Shankar Ganesh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:07:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-25700</guid> <description>Thanks for this post.. Out to download AOL Shield.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post.. Out to download AOL Shield.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Affiliate Marketing Forum</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/comment-page-1/#comment-24155</link> <dc:creator>Affiliate Marketing Forum</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 05:54:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-24155</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Anti-Virus Shooyout from AV-Test org...&lt;/strong&gt;
The AV - Test Org (Anti-Virus Test Organization) has just recently launched an anti-virus competition that involves the best anti-virus, spyware and bot detectors available.
The objective is to mak......</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Anti-Virus Shooyout from AV-Test org&#8230;</strong></p><p>The AV &#8211; Test Org (Anti-Virus Test Organization) has just recently launched an anti-virus competition that involves the best anti-virus, spyware and bot detectors available.</p><p>The objective is to mak&#8230;&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pallab</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/comment-page-1/#comment-24033</link> <dc:creator>Pallab</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 08:43:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-24033</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;interface and customizations SUCKS !&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You should never choose an Antivirus Software based on interface. It&#039;s the biggest mistake you can make. Note that NOD32 has &lt;strong&gt;never come in top 5&lt;/strong&gt; according to these tests.
NOD32 is good for pro users as it offers a lot of options. However, its interface can be terribly confusing for a novice.
In AntiVir by default most of the options are hidden. If you switch to expert mode more options are revealed. However, still its much simpler than NOD32.
&lt;blockquote&gt;Might want to look at this too
NOD 32  yeaa !&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That is retrospective test - not on demand. As I said NOD32 has one of the best engines. However, it has a relatively weak database.
Also, NOD32 was outperformed by AntiVir again. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>interface and customizations SUCKS !</p></blockquote><p>You should never choose an Antivirus Software based on interface. It&#8217;s the biggest mistake you can make. Note that NOD32 has <strong>never come in top 5</strong> according to these tests.</p><p>NOD32 is good for pro users as it offers a lot of options. However, its interface can be terribly confusing for a novice.<br
/> In AntiVir by default most of the options are hidden. If you switch to expert mode more options are revealed. However, still its much simpler than NOD32.</p><blockquote><p>Might want to look at this too<br
/> NOD 32  yeaa !</p></blockquote><p>That is retrospective test &#8211; not on demand. As I said NOD32 has one of the best engines. However, it has a relatively weak database.<br
/> Also, NOD32 was outperformed by AntiVir again.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aman</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/comment-page-1/#comment-24023</link> <dc:creator>Aman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 21:03:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-24023</guid> <description>Might want to look at this too :)
NOD 32 :) yeaa !
&lt;strong&gt;Link removed by Admin since it violates terms of av-comparatives.org.&lt;/strong&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might want to look at this too <img
src='http://www.pallab.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br
/> NOD 32 <img
src='http://www.pallab.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> yeaa !</p><p><strong>Link removed by Admin since it violates terms of av-comparatives.org.</strong></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aman</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/comment-page-1/#comment-24022</link> <dc:creator>Aman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 20:48:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-24022</guid> <description>I have been  a fan of NOD32 ..
I tried avira n your saying .. interface and customizations SUCKS !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been  a fan of NOD32 ..<br
/> I tried avira n your saying .. interface and customizations SUCKS !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
