<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Antivirus Shootout from Av-Test.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/</link>
	<description>by Pallab</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LOL</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-54397</link>
		<dc:creator>LOL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 03:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-54397</guid>
		<description>LOL...I stay away from anything with AOL in it. I have a great hatred for AOL that dates back to troubleshooting their service over 10 years ago. And besides this comparison is not even valid anymore. AOL sheild is no longer distributed.

We're Sorry! 
AOLŽ Active Virus Shield is no longer available. 
Looking for protection from viruses, spyware and hackers? 
We are now offering McAfeeŽ Virus Scan Plus-Special edition from AOL. 

EWWW MCAFEEEE..JUST AS BAD AS AOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL&#8230;I stay away from anything with AOL in it. I have a great hatred for AOL that dates back to troubleshooting their service over 10 years ago. And besides this comparison is not even valid anymore. AOL sheild is no longer distributed.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re Sorry!<br />
AOLŽ Active Virus Shield is no longer available.<br />
Looking for protection from viruses, spyware and hackers?<br />
We are now offering McAfeeŽ Virus Scan Plus-Special edition from AOL. </p>
<p>EWWW MCAFEEEE..JUST AS BAD AS AOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anynomus</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-43422</link>
		<dc:creator>anynomus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-43422</guid>
		<description>Yes , Avira Antivir is real good .
Those people who complain abt the GUI/interface
probably bcoz they cant find any faults with it
or accept the fact that it has got better.

Good recommendation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes , Avira Antivir is real good .<br />
Those people who complain abt the GUI/interface<br />
probably bcoz they cant find any faults with it<br />
or accept the fact that it has got better.</p>
<p>Good recommendation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shankar Ganesh</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-25700</link>
		<dc:creator>Shankar Ganesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-25700</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post.. Out to download AOL Shield.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post.. Out to download AOL Shield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affiliate Marketing Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-24155</link>
		<dc:creator>Affiliate Marketing Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 05:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-24155</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Anti-Virus Shooyout from AV-Test org...&lt;/strong&gt;

The AV - Test Org (Anti-Virus Test Organization) has just recently launched an anti-virus competition that involves the best anti-virus, spyware and bot detectors available.

The objective is to mak......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Anti-Virus Shooyout from AV-Test org&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The AV - Test Org (Anti-Virus Test Organization) has just recently launched an anti-virus competition that involves the best anti-virus, spyware and bot detectors available.</p>
<p>The objective is to mak&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pallab</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-24033</link>
		<dc:creator>Pallab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 08:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-24033</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;interface and customizations SUCKS !&lt;/blockquote&gt;


You should never choose an Antivirus Software based on interface. It's the biggest mistake you can make. Note that NOD32 has &lt;strong&gt;never come in top 5&lt;/strong&gt; according to these tests.

NOD32 is good for pro users as it offers a lot of options. However, its interface can be terribly confusing for a novice.
In AntiVir by default most of the options are hidden. If you switch to expert mode more options are revealed. However, still its much simpler than NOD32.



&lt;blockquote&gt;Might want to look at this too 
NOD 32  yeaa !&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That is retrospective test - not on demand. As I said NOD32 has one of the best engines. However, it has a relatively weak database.
Also, NOD32 was outperformed by AntiVir again.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>interface and customizations SUCKS !</p></blockquote>
<p>You should never choose an Antivirus Software based on interface. It&#8217;s the biggest mistake you can make. Note that NOD32 has <strong>never come in top 5</strong> according to these tests.</p>
<p>NOD32 is good for pro users as it offers a lot of options. However, its interface can be terribly confusing for a novice.<br />
In AntiVir by default most of the options are hidden. If you switch to expert mode more options are revealed. However, still its much simpler than NOD32.</p>
<blockquote><p>Might want to look at this too<br />
NOD 32  yeaa !</p></blockquote>
<p>That is retrospective test - not on demand. As I said NOD32 has one of the best engines. However, it has a relatively weak database.<br />
Also, NOD32 was outperformed by AntiVir again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aman</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-24023</link>
		<dc:creator>Aman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 21:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-24023</guid>
		<description>Might want to look at this too :)
NOD 32 :) yeaa !



&lt;strong&gt;Link removed by Admin since it violates terms of av-comparatives.org.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might want to look at this too <img src='http://www.pallab.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
NOD 32 <img src='http://www.pallab.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> yeaa !</p>
<p><strong>Link removed by Admin since it violates terms of av-comparatives.org.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aman</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-24022</link>
		<dc:creator>Aman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 20:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-24022</guid>
		<description>I have been  a fan of NOD32 ..
I tried avira n your saying .. interface and customizations SUCKS !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been  a fan of NOD32 ..<br />
I tried avira n your saying .. interface and customizations SUCKS !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
