<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Antivirus Shootout from Av-Test.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/</link>
	<description>Not Just Another Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:14:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1-RC1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LOL</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/comment-page-1/#comment-54397</link>
		<dc:creator>LOL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 03:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-54397</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL&#8230;I stay away from anything with AOL in it. I have a great hatred for AOL that dates back to troubleshooting their service over 10 years ago. And besides this comparison is not even valid anymore. AOL sheild is no longer distributed.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re Sorry!<br />
AOLŽ Active Virus Shield is no longer available.<br />
Looking for protection from viruses, spyware and hackers?<br />
We are now offering McAfeeŽ Virus Scan Plus-Special edition from AOL. </p>
<p>EWWW MCAFEEEE..JUST AS BAD AS AOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anynomus</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/comment-page-1/#comment-43422</link>
		<dc:creator>anynomus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-43422</guid>
		<description>Yes , Avira Antivir is real good .
Those people who complain abt the GUI/interface
probably bcoz they cant find any faults with it
or accept the fact that it has got better.

Good recommendation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes , Avira Antivir is real good .<br />
Those people who complain abt the GUI/interface<br />
probably bcoz they cant find any faults with it<br />
or accept the fact that it has got better.</p>
<p>Good recommendation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shankar Ganesh</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/comment-page-1/#comment-25700</link>
		<dc:creator>Shankar Ganesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-25700</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post.. Out to download AOL Shield.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post.. Out to download AOL Shield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affiliate Marketing Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/comment-page-1/#comment-24155</link>
		<dc:creator>Affiliate Marketing Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 05:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-24155</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Anti-Virus Shooyout from AV-Test org...&lt;/strong&gt;

The AV - Test Org (Anti-Virus Test Organization) has just recently launched an anti-virus competition that involves the best anti-virus, spyware and bot detectors available.

The objective is to mak......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Anti-Virus Shooyout from AV-Test org&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The AV &#8211; Test Org (Anti-Virus Test Organization) has just recently launched an anti-virus competition that involves the best anti-virus, spyware and bot detectors available.</p>
<p>The objective is to mak&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pallab</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/comment-page-1/#comment-24033</link>
		<dc:creator>Pallab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 08:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-24033</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;interface and customizations SUCKS !&lt;/blockquote&gt;


You should never choose an Antivirus Software based on interface. It&#039;s the biggest mistake you can make. Note that NOD32 has &lt;strong&gt;never come in top 5&lt;/strong&gt; according to these tests.

NOD32 is good for pro users as it offers a lot of options. However, its interface can be terribly confusing for a novice.
In AntiVir by default most of the options are hidden. If you switch to expert mode more options are revealed. However, still its much simpler than NOD32.



&lt;blockquote&gt;Might want to look at this too 
NOD 32  yeaa !&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That is retrospective test - not on demand. As I said NOD32 has one of the best engines. However, it has a relatively weak database.
Also, NOD32 was outperformed by AntiVir again.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>interface and customizations SUCKS !</p></blockquote>
<p>You should never choose an Antivirus Software based on interface. It&#8217;s the biggest mistake you can make. Note that NOD32 has <strong>never come in top 5</strong> according to these tests.</p>
<p>NOD32 is good for pro users as it offers a lot of options. However, its interface can be terribly confusing for a novice.<br />
In AntiVir by default most of the options are hidden. If you switch to expert mode more options are revealed. However, still its much simpler than NOD32.</p>
<blockquote><p>Might want to look at this too<br />
NOD 32  yeaa !</p></blockquote>
<p>That is retrospective test &#8211; not on demand. As I said NOD32 has one of the best engines. However, it has a relatively weak database.<br />
Also, NOD32 was outperformed by AntiVir again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aman</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/comment-page-1/#comment-24023</link>
		<dc:creator>Aman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 21:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-24023</guid>
		<description>Might want to look at this too :)
NOD 32 :) yeaa !



&lt;strong&gt;Link removed by Admin since it violates terms of av-comparatives.org.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might want to look at this too <img src='http://www.pallab.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
NOD 32 <img src='http://www.pallab.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  yeaa !</p>
<p><strong>Link removed by Admin since it violates terms of av-comparatives.org.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aman</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/comment-page-1/#comment-24022</link>
		<dc:creator>Aman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 20:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2007/06/01/new-antivirus-shootout-from-av-testorg/#comment-24022</guid>
		<description>I have been  a fan of NOD32 ..
I tried avira n your saying .. interface and customizations SUCKS !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been  a fan of NOD32 ..<br />
I tried avira n your saying .. interface and customizations SUCKS !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
