<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review : WindowFX 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/</link>
	<description>by Pallab</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pallab</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator>Pallab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 20:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/#comment-1423</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Quoting Rohan Prabhu&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;And mostly, I never liked most of the Stardock products. They are nothing but bloatwares… StyleXP handles resources much better&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Style XP themes are just MSStyles. Using a patched Uxtheme.dll is a better option. Style xp runs an unnecessary service. If you use a light windowblinds theme the resource usage will be same or lower. Remember that  msstyles runs a service in the background that uses up memory.
Also, other functionalities provided by stylexp are surpassed by stardock products. Bootskin is the best software for chanding bootskins. Also it's skins are much smaller than stylexp's bootskins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Quoting Rohan Prabhu</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>And mostly, I never liked most of the Stardock products. They are nothing but bloatwares… StyleXP handles resources much better</p></blockquote>
<p>Style XP themes are just MSStyles. Using a patched Uxtheme.dll is a better option. Style xp runs an unnecessary service. If you use a light windowblinds theme the resource usage will be same or lower. Remember that  msstyles runs a service in the background that uses up memory.<br />
Also, other functionalities provided by stylexp are surpassed by stardock products. Bootskin is the best software for chanding bootskins. Also it&#8217;s skins are much smaller than stylexp&#8217;s bootskins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dhruv</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator>Dhruv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/#comment-1422</guid>
		<description>"One effect that I would urge you to try is the Genie effect"

That's the most rubbish effect ever , simply sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One effect that I would urge you to try is the Genie effect&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the most rubbish effect ever , simply sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aman</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>Aman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 18:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/#comment-1397</guid>
		<description>Though i also dont like skinning apps the specs on which this was tested is very similer to mine .
And if no drags were experienced ; gr8 !!
Awesome review !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though i also dont like skinning apps the specs on which this was tested is very similer to mine .<br />
And if no drags were experienced ; gr8 !!<br />
Awesome review !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohan Prabhu</title>
		<link>http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Prabhu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>Hmm.. But i prefer the old 'Windows Classic' theme. Saves me on resources. And mostly, I never liked most of the Stardock products. They are nothing but bloatwares... StyleXP handles resources much better. Anyways, the effects in Stardock's products are something, nobody can rival. Add it up with a few Konfab widgets, an object bar skin and you have a killer desktop with you... But just beware, that you need loads of processing power on yer' hand... ;)

Rohan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.. But i prefer the old &#8216;Windows Classic&#8217; theme. Saves me on resources. And mostly, I never liked most of the Stardock products. They are nothing but bloatwares&#8230; StyleXP handles resources much better. Anyways, the effects in Stardock&#8217;s products are something, nobody can rival. Add it up with a few Konfab widgets, an object bar skin and you have a killer desktop with you&#8230; But just beware, that you need loads of processing power on yer&#8217; hand&#8230; <img src='http://www.pallab.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Rohan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
