<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Review : WindowFX 3</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:03:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Pallab</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1423</link> <dc:creator>Pallab</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 20:09:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/#comment-1423</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Quoting Rohan Prabhu&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;And mostly, I never liked most of the Stardock products. They are nothing but bloatwares… StyleXP handles resources much better&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Style XP themes are just MSStyles. Using a patched Uxtheme.dll is a better option. Style xp runs an unnecessary service. If you use a light windowblinds theme the resource usage will be same or lower. Remember that  msstyles runs a service in the background that uses up memory.
Also, other functionalities provided by stylexp are surpassed by stardock products. Bootskin is the best software for chanding bootskins. Also it&#039;s skins are much smaller than stylexp&#039;s bootskins.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Quoting Rohan Prabhu</strong></p><blockquote><p>And mostly, I never liked most of the Stardock products. They are nothing but bloatwares… StyleXP handles resources much better</p></blockquote><p>Style XP themes are just MSStyles. Using a patched Uxtheme.dll is a better option. Style xp runs an unnecessary service. If you use a light windowblinds theme the resource usage will be same or lower. Remember that  msstyles runs a service in the background that uses up memory.<br
/> Also, other functionalities provided by stylexp are surpassed by stardock products. Bootskin is the best software for chanding bootskins. Also it&#8217;s skins are much smaller than stylexp&#8217;s bootskins.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dhruv</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1422</link> <dc:creator>Dhruv</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/#comment-1422</guid> <description>&quot;One effect that I would urge you to try is the Genie effect&quot;
That&#039;s the most rubbish effect ever , simply sucks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One effect that I would urge you to try is the Genie effect&#8221;</p><p>That&#8217;s the most rubbish effect ever , simply sucks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aman</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1397</link> <dc:creator>Aman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 18:24:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/#comment-1397</guid> <description>Though i also dont like skinning apps the specs on which this was tested is very similer to mine .
And if no drags were experienced ; gr8 !!
Awesome review !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though i also dont like skinning apps the specs on which this was tested is very similer to mine .<br
/> And if no drags were experienced ; gr8 !!<br
/> Awesome review !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rohan Prabhu</title><link>http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1395</link> <dc:creator>Rohan Prabhu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:31:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallab.net/2006/06/14/review-windowfx-3/#comment-1395</guid> <description>Hmm.. But i prefer the old &#039;Windows Classic&#039; theme. Saves me on resources. And mostly, I never liked most of the Stardock products. They are nothing but bloatwares... StyleXP handles resources much better. Anyways, the effects in Stardock&#039;s products are something, nobody can rival. Add it up with a few Konfab widgets, an object bar skin and you have a killer desktop with you... But just beware, that you need loads of processing power on yer&#039; hand... ;)
Rohan</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.. But i prefer the old &#8216;Windows Classic&#8217; theme. Saves me on resources. And mostly, I never liked most of the Stardock products. They are nothing but bloatwares&#8230; StyleXP handles resources much better. Anyways, the effects in Stardock&#8217;s products are something, nobody can rival. Add it up with a few Konfab widgets, an object bar skin and you have a killer desktop with you&#8230; But just beware, that you need loads of processing power on yer&#8217; hand&#8230; <img
src='http://www.pallab.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Rohan</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
